<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>~#nixy &#187; debian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nixy.dk/tag/debian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nixy.dk</link>
	<description>Nix is sexy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:04:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>VMWare-server 8-char bug</title>
		<link>http://nixy.dk/2008/01/20/vmware-8-char-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://nixy.dk/2008/01/20/vmware-8-char-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rada</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vmware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8021q]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixy.dk/2008/01/20/vmware-8-char-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[VMWare-server has a bug that doesn&#8217;t allow network interface device names to be more than 8 characters long. Yes, this is not a typo: If your interface name is more than 8 characters long, you&#8217;re out of luck. The origin of the bug for me is unknown. Naturally, I&#8217;ve had to research this issue as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VMWare-server has a bug that doesn&#8217;t allow network interface device names to be more than 8 characters long. Yes, this is not a typo: If your interface name is more than 8 characters long, you&#8217;re out of luck.</p>
<p>The origin of the bug for me is unknown. Naturally, I&#8217;ve had to research this issue as it became apparent to me when I had to set up two network interfaces in bonding (Thus calling them bond0) and then putting this new virtual interface into work with two 8021q vlan&#8217;s (Thus calling them bond0.100 and bond0.101). Now, I do realize that having a 9-character long interface name is a bit on the side of the unusual, but rarely you&#8217;d spot any software which supports any less than 255 characters, right? I mean, this is just common sense these days. Pretending to hunt for bits of RAM by shaving off something like 248 bytes just SO belongs back in 1980&#8242;s computing. Not fixing this bug from version 1.0.0 to version 1.0.4 of your software belongs back at Microsoft. Not having a part of your website dedicated to bug reports belongs back in FAIL.</p>
<p>Anyway, this is not an opinion piece.</p>
<p>After spending a good part of  a weeks worth of office time hunting down this bug, I finally decided to trace back my steps and see if there was something I could do to solve this problem.</p>
<p>When creating vlans on an interface in Linux, you usually use a tool called vconfig. Turns out that vconfig had the option to provide a custom naming scheme. Just run <code>vconfig set_name_type VLAN_PLUS_VID_NO_PAD</code> and you&#8217;re golden. Now your interface name is called vlan100 or something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nixy.dk/2008/01/20/vmware-8-char-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->